Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column

From: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
To: Gilles Darold <gilles(at)migops(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
Date: 2021-10-17 21:04:15
Message-ID: b8872fd9-c5d1-0480-aab2-a1f9e388c513@postgresfriends.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/17/21 11:01 PM, Gilles Darold wrote:
>
>   - Add a check into SET UNEXPANDED code to verify that there is at
> least one column expanded.

What is the point of this? Postgres allows column-less tables.

Both of these statements are valid:

- CREATE TABLE nada ();
- SELECT;
--
Vik Fearing

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2021-10-17 21:07:40 Re: [PATCH] Make ENOSPC not fatal in semaphore creation
Previous Message Gilles Darold 2021-10-17 21:01:08 Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column