Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats
Date: 2024-10-02 02:21:50
Message-ID: b7a739fb-8bc1-4ea8-a1fd-cfede2346f36@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024/10/02 1:50, Nitin Jadhav wrote:
>> Before committing the patch, I revised it with the following changes:
>>
>> - I added "shared" to the description of pg_stat_checkpointer.buffers_written
>> to clarify that it tracks shared buffers.
>> - In the checkpoint log message, I replaced "slru" with "SLRU" for consistency,
>> as uppercase is typically used for SLRU.
>> - I updated the commit message.
>
> Thanks for updating. Looks good to me.

Thanks for the review! Pushed.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-10-02 02:28:26 Re: Call rm_redo in a temporary memory context
Previous Message jian he 2024-10-02 01:50:47 Re: general purpose array_sort