From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Logical Replication WIP |
Date: | 2017-01-11 17:32:26 |
Message-ID: | b744a040-1d50-12d6-315f-d0f0fd7cf16f@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/11/17 3:29 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> Okay, looking into my notes, I originally did this because we did not
> allow adding tables without pkeys to publications which effectively
> prohibited FOR ALL TABLES publication from working because of
> information_schema without this. Since this is no longer the case I
> think it's safe to skip the FirstNormalObjectId check.
Wouldn't that mean that FOR ALL TABLES replicates the tables from
information_schema?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2017-01-11 17:53:39 | Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-01-11 17:27:16 | Re: Logical Replication WIP |