From: | "Peter Kovacs" <maxottovonstirlitz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Carlos Moreno" <moreno_pg(at)mochima(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? |
Date: | 2007-02-25 22:11:01 |
Message-ID: | b6e8f2e80702251411q5a27eb53re9c2a299b8e3880a@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
A related question:
Is it sufficient to disable write cache only on the disk where pg_xlog
is located? Or should write cache be disabled on both disks?
Thanks
Peter
On 2/25/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Carlos Moreno <moreno_pg(at)mochima(dot)com> writes:
> > The question is: does PostgreSQL have separate, independent areas that
> > require storage such that performance would be noticeably boosted if
> > the multiple storage operations could be done simultaneously?
>
> The standard advice in this area is to put pg_xlog on a separate
> spindle; although that probably is only important for update-intensive
> applications. You did not tell us anything about your application...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ashok@kalculate.com | 2007-02-26 05:44:06 | invalid page header in block 428 of relation "pg_attribute" |
Previous Message | Alexander Staubo | 2007-02-25 04:08:34 | Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? |