Re: User documentation vs Official Docs

From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: User documentation vs Official Docs
Date: 2018-07-19 17:43:18
Message-ID: b6c810b7-00a2-c534-67e7-ccf028fe8394@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 07/19/2018 11:04 AM, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2018-07-18 08:09:35 +1000, Tim Cross wrote:
>> If using web widgets to author content on the wiki is the main
>> impediment for contributing content, maybe we should see if the wiki
>> provides alternative access methods. I've used wikis in the past which
>> allowed users to upload content via xmlrpc, api etc. Perhaps something
>> similar could be made available for those making significant
>> contributions or to a select few 'curators' who could accept content
>> from others.
> There are also browser plugins like It's all text, textern, wasavi, etc.
> which allow the user to use a real text editor instead of a text area.
>
> hp
>
Keep in mind that Chrome broke "It's all text" compatibility, at least
with emacs and now it's done via "Edit with Emacs".  This in my
experience is a step backwards from "It's all text".

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter J. Holzer 2018-07-19 17:58:21 Re: User documentation vs Official Docs
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2018-07-19 17:24:31 Re: functions with side effect