| From: | Rauan Maemirov <rauan1987(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Query Optimization with Kruskal’s Algorithm |
| Date: | 2008-05-10 17:31:22 |
| Message-ID: | b685fbf7-0845-4ea2-9c7e-0cf8e57ba785@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On May 8, 2:09 am, a(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)purefiction(dot)net ("Alexander Staubo") wrote:
> On 5/7/08, Tarcizio Bini <tarcizi(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)c3sl(dot)ufpr(dot)br> wrote:
>
> > I'm working on optimizing queries using the Kruskal algorithm
> > (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4318118)
>
> That paper looks very interesting. I would love to hear what the
> PostgreSQL committers think of this algorithm.
>
> Alexander.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performa(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
I also would like to hear from them. But seems like the thread is
loosed in tonn of other threads.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2008-05-10 18:26:51 | Re: Re: Query Optimization with Kruskal’s Algorithm |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2008-05-10 11:42:28 | Re: plan difference between set-returning function with ROWS within IN() and a plain join |