Re: INNER JOIN syntax is not commonly used?

From: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>
To: max1(at)inbox(dot)ru, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: INNER JOIN syntax is not commonly used?
Date: 2021-03-07 11:45:46
Message-ID: b5bdc2dc-ceb4-52e9-2fc1-83b771829a2b@postgresfriends.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 3/7/21 10:33 AM, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/tutorial-join.html
> Description:
>
> This page shows a WHERE syntax to join tables.
>
> After that it shows an example of the INNER JOIN syntax:
> SELECT *
> FROM weather INNER JOIN cities ON (weather.city = cities.name);
>
> And after that it says the following:
> "This syntax is not as commonly used as the one above, "
>
> So, this documentation claims that the INNER JOIN syntax is not as common as
> WHERE syntax.
> Is this really the case?

I don't remember the last time I saw a new query use the <table
reference list> syntax. In my experience, the <joined table> syntax is
much more common. I vote to change the wording on that page.
--
Vik Fearing

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2021-03-07 12:05:43 Re: INNER JOIN syntax is not commonly used?
Previous Message Andrew Grillet 2021-03-07 11:42:23 Re: INNER JOIN syntax is not commonly used?