Re: vacuum on table with all rows frozen

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Tom DalPozzo <t(dot)dalpozzo(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: vacuum on table with all rows frozen
Date: 2017-04-01 16:34:17
Message-ID: b4a0a898-3fad-2a97-0e9b-44963b7193eb@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 04/01/2017 09:09 AM, Tom DalPozzo wrote:
> Hi,
> let's suppose I have a table which after beign populated with only
> INSERTs, doesn't receive no more writing queries (neither insert or
> update or delete). Only reading queries.
> Once all table rows get frozen by (auto)vacuum, will a next (auto)vacuum
> scan that table for any reason or does it understand that it would be
> useless (as no more rows to mark as forzen and no dead tuples) ?

What version of Postgres?

Don't vacuum all-frozen pages.:

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=fd31cd265138019dcccc9b5fe53043670898bc9f

That made it into 9.6:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/release-9-6.html

E.3.3.1.6. VACUUM

Avoid re-vacuuming pages containing only frozen tuples (Masahiko Sawada,
Robert Haas, Andres Freund)

> As I will have hunderds of big tables like that, I want to be sure that
> the vacuum process doesn't waste time.
> Regards
> Pupillo
>
>
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom DalPozzo 2017-04-01 16:50:25 Re: vacuum on table with all rows frozen
Previous Message Tom DalPozzo 2017-04-01 16:09:37 vacuum on table with all rows frozen