From: | Dominik Składanowski <dskladanowski(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql 8.0 or 8.1 vs. latest Red Hat RPM |
Date: | 2006-02-09 22:58:37 |
Message-ID: | b499671a0602091458x272e46b0v@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hello list,
Bradley Kieser wrote:
> I would always use the latest stable release from the PG project for
> four reasons:
> a) Databases are notoriously difficult to upgrade once they are in [ ... ]
>
> b) The dev team just keeps on making this wonderful DB better. Every
> release is a gem and well worth having.
>
> c) PG runs on RedHat no problems. Besides which, in the real world, if [ ... ]
>
> d) Most importantly: You WILL be testing the new PG release in addition [ ... ]
Your arguments convinced me to use latest stable PostgreSQL database.
I use CentOS 4.x (as you know it is RHEL4 compatibile) and I have
successfuly installed PostgreSQL 8.1.2 from www.postgresql.org.
And now, if I need PostgreSQL as a base for PHP aplication? Package
php-pgsql-4.3.9-3.9.rpm (distributed with CentOS/RHEL) will be works
with PostgreSQL 8.1.2?
Regards
--
__________________________________________________________________
D o m i n i k S k ł a d a n o w s k i
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2006-02-09 23:06:56 | Re: Postgresql 8.0 or 8.1 vs. latest Red Hat RPM |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2006-02-09 22:18:25 | Re: Upgrading O/S requires Postgres re-build? |