Re: Typed tables

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Typed tables
Date: 2009-11-05 21:55:43
Message-ID: b42b73150911051355p12747d17hb4c75476c97adfe1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> I'm planning to work on typed tables support.  The idea is that you
> create a table out of a composite type (as opposed to the other way
> around, which is currently done automatically).
>
> CREATE TYPE persons_type AS (name text, bdate date);
>
> CREATE TABLE persons OF persons_type;
>
> Or the fancy version:
>
> CREATE TABLE persons OF persons_type ( PRIMARY KEY (name) );

I use composite types (via tables) all the time but I never use
'create type as'...because by doing so you lose the ability to alter
the type with 'alter table'.

Am I correct that I could use your idea to make this possible (albeit
quite ugly) by:

create type foo(a text, b text);
create table foo of foo;
alter table foo add column c text;
drop table foo; -- does this drop the type as well??

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-05 21:57:47 Re: AFTER triggers & RETURN
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-11-05 21:46:10 Re: AFTER triggers & RETURN