| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marco Fortina <marco(dot)fortina(at)bsc(dot)it> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: NAS |
| Date: | 2009-09-18 19:16:05 |
| Message-ID: | b42b73150909181216n5fa347b5i4537e3b4695b41c2@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Marco Fortina <marco(dot)fortina(at)bsc(dot)it> wrote:
>
> Hello there!
>
> A customer of our company would like to create a 2 nodes cluster connected
> to an external NAS storage. I would like to know if PostgreSQL supports its
> datafiles on this kind of storage and if this solution is certified.
probably you are interested in the hot standby feature which is
looking like a lock for 8.5. it's not exactly what you asked for (you
need two complete copies of your database), but you get high
availability, a queryable slave, and very strong data guarantees if
combined with synchronous replication.
As for NAS, just pretend it stands for: Nightmare (of) Administrator
Scenario :-)
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Bailey | 2009-09-18 20:25:13 | Re: Repetitive fields |
| Previous Message | Alban Hertroys | 2009-09-18 17:51:06 | Re: concatenation issue ( 8.4 ) |