Re: View vs Stored Proc Performance

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jason Tesser <jasontesser(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: View vs Stored Proc Performance
Date: 2009-09-11 21:01:05
Message-ID: b42b73150909111401p71b3d8e6r28044b4e5b9c8109@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Jason Tesser <jasontesser(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> OK so in my case I have a Person, Email, Phone and Address table.  I want to
> return the Person and an Array of the others. so my return type would be
> something like Person, Email[], Phone[], Address[]
>
> When passed a personId.
>
> Are you saying this is better in a view.  Create a view that can return that
> as oppessed to 1. defining a type for a function to return or 2. a function
> that returns 4 out parameters (Person, Address[] ,....)

if you are using 8.3+ and are wiling to make a composite type:

create table person_t(email text, phone text, address text);

select person_id, array_agg((email, phone, address)::person_t) from
person group by 1;

or, detail fields are in another table:

select person_id, (select array(select (email, phone,
address)::person_t) from detail where person_id = p.person_id) from
person_t;

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Tesser 2009-09-11 21:27:24 Re: View vs Stored Proc Performance
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-09-11 20:47:22 Re: odd iostat graph