| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] new digest datatypes, or generic fixed-len hex types? |
| Date: | 2009-07-27 15:12:48 |
| Message-ID: | b42b73150907270812q69f985f8x73d02a2fd198aa25@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> We've developed some code to implement fixed-length datatypes for well
>> known digest function output (MD5, SHA1 and the various SHA2 types).
>> These types have minimal overhead and are quite complete, including
>> btree and hash opclasses.
>
>> We're wondering about proposing them for inclusion in pgcrypto.
>
> Wasn't this proposed and rejected before? (Or more to the point,
> why'd you bother? The advantage over bytea seems negligible.)
well, one nice things about the fixed length types is that you can
keep your table from needing a toast table when you have a bytea in
it.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-27 15:27:41 | Re: Non-blocking communication between a frontend and a backend (pqcomm) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-27 15:09:28 | Re: Review: support for multiplexing SIGUSR1 |