From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)sbcglobal(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: commercial adaptation of postgres |
Date: | 2009-07-21 18:27:19 |
Message-ID: | b42b73150907211127g4038b58fgb9242a62331ee7a2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Dennis Gearon<gearond(at)sbcglobal(dot)net> wrote:
>
> I once talked to a company that made a custome version of Postgres. It split tables up on columns and also by rows, had some other custome features. It was enormously faster from what I gathered.
Faster at some things :-). column oriented db is a tradeoff...it's
less work to get one or two columns but your record is not guaranteed
to be in one place on disk...which has obvious downsides. I don't
have any evidence other than my gut, but I betcha column db being an
'evolutionary step' above current methods is mostly hype. However for
certain workloads I'm sure it's great...
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-07-21 18:29:12 | Re: element from an array by its index |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-07-21 18:18:24 | Re: killing processes |