Re: commercial adaptation of postgres

From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)sbcglobal(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: commercial adaptation of postgres
Date: 2009-07-21 18:27:19
Message-ID: b42b73150907211127g4038b58fgb9242a62331ee7a2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Dennis Gearon<gearond(at)sbcglobal(dot)net> wrote:
>
> I once talked to a company that made a custome version of Postgres. It split tables up on columns and also by rows, had some other custome features. It was enormously faster from what I gathered.

Faster at some things :-). column oriented db is a tradeoff...it's
less work to get one or two columns but your record is not guaranteed
to be in one place on disk...which has obvious downsides. I don't
have any evidence other than my gut, but I betcha column db being an
'evolutionary step' above current methods is mostly hype. However for
certain workloads I'm sure it's great...

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2009-07-21 18:29:12 Re: element from an array by its index
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2009-07-21 18:18:24 Re: killing processes