Re: PGSQL x iptables

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Craig Ringer
<craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> Slansky Lukas wrote:
>
>> 1. -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
>>
>> 2. -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp -s
>> aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd --dport 5432 -j ACCEPT
>>
>> 3. -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
>>
>>
>> I was wondering when these rules are not OK for our environment. It seems
>> that rules 1 and 2 sometimes pass packets and therefore these packets are
>> rejected.
>
> After a long period of inactivity, perhaps?
>
> If you're relying on `-m state' or `-m ctstate' you should be using a TCP
> keepalive. Otherwise the connection tracking entry for the connection will
> be purged after a while - how long depends on your firewall configuration -
> and then packets will no longer be seen as part of an established
> connection.

small addendum: i bet this is the problem. You can configure server
keepalives in postgresql.conf. I'd suggest two minutes
(tcp_keepalives_idle=120) .

merlin