From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | John Lister <john(dot)lister-ps(at)kickstone(dot)com>, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Array types |
Date: | 2009-04-08 15:46:07 |
Message-ID: | b42b73150904080846n257f7c21rd77f63f7f43c4063@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 4:11 PM, John Lister
> <john(dot)lister-ps(at)kickstone(dot)com> wrote:
>> Cheers for the pointers. Am i right in thinking that if i get an array of
>> arrays, the nested arrays are sent in wire format as well - it seems to be
>> from the docs.
>
> No, you can't easily get an array of arrays in Postgres. You can get
> multi-dimensional arrays but that's one big array with multiple
> dimensions. The text output form does look like an array of arrays
> but they don't behave like you might think they would:
one note about that: you can have array of composites with arrays in
them, so you can get arbitrary levels of nesting.
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-04-08 15:50:19 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
Previous Message | John Lister | 2009-04-08 15:45:24 | Re: Array types |