| From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Controlling hot standby |
| Date: | 2009-01-23 15:05:20 |
| Message-ID: | b42b73150901230705q526edf10ob0aaf38a4f95a835@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/23/09, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 12:58 +0200, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 10:05 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > > I'll add it now, default = on.
> > >
> > > Did you mean "off"?
> >
> > No, do you?
>
>
> Depends on the setting :-) It is "hot_standby=off" by default, right?
> I think having a double negative "disable_hot_standby=off" would be
> awkward.
Is 'hot standby' going to be the official moniker for the feature?
(not 'standby replication', or something else?). I wonder if we
should pick something more descriptive.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sam Mason | 2009-01-23 15:06:55 | Re: deductive databases in postgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-01-23 14:43:23 | Re: Hot Standby (v9d) |