Re: Polymorphic "setof record" function?

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Christian Schröder <cs(at)deriva(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Polymorphic "setof record" function?
Date: 2009-01-14 16:46:29
Message-ID: b42b73150901140846y11a22486r8793f23105145111@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 1/13/09, Christian Schröder <cs(at)deriva(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi list,
> I have written a function that returns a setof record. The function has a
> table name as a parameter and the resulting records have the same structure
> as this table. Is there any easy way to specify this when I call the
> function? If the table has many columns then it's annoying to specify all of
> them.
> I need something like:
> select * from myfunc('mytable') as x(like mytable)
> or
> select * from myfunc('mytable') as x(mytable%TYPE)
>
> Is there any solution for PostgreSQL 8.2?

Unfortunately to the best of my knowledge there is no way to do this.
I think what you want is to have sql functions that specialize on
type in the way that templates do in C++.

This is _not_ the same as polymorhphic functions(anyelement, etc),
because you would _end_up_with_as_separate_plan_per_type_ (and other
reasons). Polymorphic functions are more similar to how inheritance
in c++ works...you operate on the 'base' type.

The type inferring operator (%type) is only part of the problem, you
need to be able to create functions that it is known to the planner
that it's template style:

IMHO, this is a better abstraction than our current anyX pseudotypes,
outside of the anyarray tricks.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roderick A. Anderson 2009-01-14 17:30:17 Re: Multi-tenant cluster
Previous Message Gerhard Heift 2009-01-14 14:52:46 fire trigger for a row without update?