| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Recovery Test Framework |
| Date: | 2009-01-12 16:47:29 |
| Message-ID: | b42b73150901120847w244aabe8q5c6b26f13f0413c7@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/12/09, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Basically I think we are up against the same type of project management
> > decision we've had several times before: are we willing to slip the
> > 8.4 release schedule for however long it will take for hot standby
> > and the other replication-related features to be ready?
>
>
> I would certainly not like to see 8.4 slip.
8.4 has already slipped. From my (basically a user's persepective)
the thing is ready to drop in right now...it works wonderfully. So,
*) Does Simon intend for 8.4 release
*) Is the thing up to production standards?
*) If so, is a patch ready?
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-01-12 16:48:38 | Re: Recovery Test Framework |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-12 16:46:47 | Re: pg_restore -1 vs -C and -c |