On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Ketema Harris <ketema(at)ketema(dot)net> wrote:
> I have just re-read chapter 8.15 of the 8.3 manual and I am understanding
> why a composite type would evaluate to NUll if any of it elements are null.
>
> Can anyone explain this behavior? To me if I have a composite type column
> and there are some values in it, its incomplete, yes, but not null.
can you be a little more specific?
postgres=# create table ct(a int, b int, c int);
CREATE TABLE
postgres=#
postgres=# select (1, null, 2)::ct;
row
--------
(1,,2)
(1 row)
postgres=# select (1, null, 2)::ct is null;
?column?
----------
f
(1 row)
note, there is significant behavior change in the way composite type
works in comparison purposes for 8.4, which I am using.
merlin