| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ketema Harris" <ketema(at)ketema(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Composite type evaluates to Null if any element is null |
| Date: | 2008-12-17 16:50:57 |
| Message-ID: | b42b73150812170850w3cc2a2far2edf72bd021e5fdc@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Ketema Harris <ketema(at)ketema(dot)net> wrote:
> I have just re-read chapter 8.15 of the 8.3 manual and I am understanding
> why a composite type would evaluate to NUll if any of it elements are null.
>
> Can anyone explain this behavior? To me if I have a composite type column
> and there are some values in it, its incomplete, yes, but not null.
can you be a little more specific?
postgres=# create table ct(a int, b int, c int);
CREATE TABLE
postgres=#
postgres=# select (1, null, 2)::ct;
row
--------
(1,,2)
(1 row)
postgres=# select (1, null, 2)::ct is null;
?column?
----------
f
(1 row)
note, there is significant behavior change in the way composite type
works in comparison purposes for 8.4, which I am using.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonatan Evald Buus | 2008-12-17 16:54:12 | Prevent new timeline during archive recovery |
| Previous Message | Willy-Bas Loos | 2008-12-17 16:44:16 | Re: what happens to indexes when TRUNCATEing |