| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amber <guxiaobo1982(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL TPC-H test result? |
| Date: | 2008-09-09 15:35:16 |
| Message-ID: | b42b73150809090835m6e7781f1uf4ba76fd889447d3@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Amber <guxiaobo1982(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes, we don't care about the performance results, but we do care about the point that PostgreSQL can't give the correct results of TPC-H queries.
PostgreSQL, at least in terms of the open source databases, is
probably your best bet if you are all concerned about correctness. Do
not give any credence to a vendor published benchmark unless the test
is published and can be independently verifed.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amber | 2008-09-09 15:35:56 | PostgreSQL process architecture question. |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-09-09 15:29:54 | Re: PostgreSQL TPC-H test result? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-09-09 15:51:13 | Re: PostgreSQL TPC-H test result? |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-09-09 15:29:54 | Re: PostgreSQL TPC-H test result? |