From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SSD database benchmarks |
Date: | 2008-04-29 23:27:20 |
Message-ID: | b42b73150804291627o368e737eg6ff3dbf8ac081fc8@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
> This is the best write-up I've seen yet on quantifying what SSDs are good
> and bad at in a database context:
>
> http://www.bigdbahead.com/?p=37
>
> --
> * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
here is another really informative article (pdf)
http://www.storagesearch.com/easyco-flashperformance-art.pdf.
The conclusions are different...they claim it's hard to make good use
of ssd advantages if you do any random writing at all. Of course,
they are also developing an automagical solution to the problem. The
information is good though...it's certainly worth a read. The problem
is probably solvable.
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Len Shapiro | 2008-04-30 04:56:32 | Understanding histograms |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-04-29 23:26:02 | Re: SSD database benchmarks |