| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Cultural Sublimation" <cultural_sublimation(at)yahoo(dot)com>, "Sam Mason" <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL and SETOF |
| Date: | 2007-12-03 19:37:59 |
| Message-ID: | b42b73150712031137w713073c7q5f95b3a85e99f6d3@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Nov 30, 2007 1:18 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 30/11/2007, Cultural Sublimation <cultural_sublimation(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> > But still on that subject: is my version of get_items2 the simplest
> > that is possible in PL/pgSQL? It seems awfully verbose compared to
> > the SQL version...
> >
>
> no. Your simplest version is historic relict and is available only in
> sql language. I am not sure, maybe in C language too.
It is extremely useful to be able call functions in this way. I
really wish it were possible to do this with pl/sql functions as
well...
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Cesar Alvarez | 2007-12-03 19:39:55 | Re: Transaction problem |
| Previous Message | Pascal Cohen | 2007-12-03 19:37:58 | Re: HA and Replication - how to choose among all the available solutions |