From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "postgres general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: getting status transaction error |
Date: | 2007-02-06 19:50:36 |
Message-ID: | b42b73150702061150j38dca3begcca782f508de23b9@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 2/6/07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > actually, here is some more relevant bits from the log.
> > Feb 6 06:31:33 mojo postgres[1088]: [1-1] :: LOG: autovacuum:
> > processing database "template0"
> > Feb 6 06:31:33 mojo postgres[1088]: [2-1] :: ERROR: could not access
> > status of transaction 544441911
> > Feb 6 06:31:33 mojo postgres[1088]: [2-2] :: DETAIL: could not open
> > file "pg_clog/0207": No such file or directory
>
> I guess the problem here is that autovacuum believes that template0
> needs a database-wide vacuum due to Xid wraparound getting closer. And
> that database seems to have Xid 544441911 somewhere, the clog bit for
> which was in the 0207 file which was deleted some time ago.
Latest checkpoint's NextXID: 2162841139
2^31: 2147483648
is this related?
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ben | 2007-02-06 19:50:55 | Re: replication choices |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-02-06 19:47:25 | Re: [HACKERS] getting status transaction error |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-02-06 19:53:03 | Re: [HACKERS] getting status transaction error |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-02-06 19:47:25 | Re: [HACKERS] getting status transaction error |