| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Default permissisons from schemas |
| Date: | 2007-01-24 14:59:33 |
| Message-ID: | b42b73150701240659i4d18ccb1j7d59f5f8bf87f2c7@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/24/07, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> when you create them. Table rights almost always follow broad rules
> so it only natural to integrate that with schemas somehow...but
> admittedly it is awkward to put it into GRANT (and I've thought alot a
> bout.
oops :( what I meant to say here is that I don't think it's possible
to this in the way that Stephen wants because it would hack up GRANT
to much. Tom was at least half right, this proposal was not discarded
out of hand but it was on pretty shaky ground...I was one of the big
supporters of extending grant this way in the original discussion but
I think it might be the wrong approach.
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-01-24 15:02:15 | Re: Updateable cursors |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2007-01-24 14:54:47 | Re: Default permissisons from schemas |