Re: postgresql and reiserfs

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Richard Broersma Jr" <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>, km(at)mrna(dot)tn(dot)nic(dot)in, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql and reiserfs
Date: 2006-11-01 15:10:26
Message-ID: b42b73150611010710v2d917017s29472b7dac8fd939@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/31/06, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 09:31 -0800, Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
>
> > I heard that reiser4 is not yet stable. And that there is a chance
> > that it wont be since its author is in detention.
>
> Here are the links:
>
> http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/06/10/15/0057203.shtml
> http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/06/10/11/0142216.shtml?tid=123
>
> Also, SuSE announced that they will be switching to ext3 in their next
> SLES releases:
>
> http://news.com.com/Novell+makes+file-storage+software
> +shift/2100-1016_3-6125509.html
>
> Red Hat, major player in Enterprise game, is supporting ext* for years.
> reiserfs is not enabled by default.
>
> So, IMHO, since less people will be using reiser, I would not use that
> in my installations.
>
> > Most of the recommendations that I've seen are to use
> > good-old-reliable EXT3 which keeps your data safe
>
> Also ext2 is preferred on many installations, especially when people
> want to avoid journals.

If i was a betting man, I would guess that (currently being developed)
ext4 will win the filesystem popularity contest at some point in the
future, and will probably dominate enterprise linux installations.

merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trewern, Ben 2006-11-01 15:24:50 news.postgresql.org down
Previous Message Ketema 2006-11-01 15:09:28 Re: Catch multiple records when doing Select Into