From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Richard Broersma Jr" <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>, km(at)mrna(dot)tn(dot)nic(dot)in, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postgresql and reiserfs |
Date: | 2006-11-01 15:10:26 |
Message-ID: | b42b73150611010710v2d917017s29472b7dac8fd939@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 10/31/06, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 09:31 -0800, Richard Broersma Jr wrote:
>
> > I heard that reiser4 is not yet stable. And that there is a chance
> > that it wont be since its author is in detention.
>
> Here are the links:
>
> http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/06/10/15/0057203.shtml
> http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/06/10/11/0142216.shtml?tid=123
>
> Also, SuSE announced that they will be switching to ext3 in their next
> SLES releases:
>
> http://news.com.com/Novell+makes+file-storage+software
> +shift/2100-1016_3-6125509.html
>
> Red Hat, major player in Enterprise game, is supporting ext* for years.
> reiserfs is not enabled by default.
>
> So, IMHO, since less people will be using reiser, I would not use that
> in my installations.
>
> > Most of the recommendations that I've seen are to use
> > good-old-reliable EXT3 which keeps your data safe
>
> Also ext2 is preferred on many installations, especially when people
> want to avoid journals.
If i was a betting man, I would guess that (currently being developed)
ext4 will win the filesystem popularity contest at some point in the
future, and will probably dominate enterprise linux installations.
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Trewern, Ben | 2006-11-01 15:24:50 | news.postgresql.org down |
Previous Message | Ketema | 2006-11-01 15:09:28 | Re: Catch multiple records when doing Select Into |