Re: Database Auditing

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Marco Serantoni" <m(dot)serantoni(at)caltanet(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Database Auditing
Date: 2006-10-12 02:11:37
Message-ID: b42b73150610111911y483421c6maff79d75f091790f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 10/11/06, Marco Serantoni <m(dot)serantoni(at)caltanet(dot)it> wrote:
> I'm evaluating of use postgresql but for local law requirements is
> needed for the access of some kind of data (sensitive) a log of the
> accesses (Auditing) is a feature available in many databases but i've
> seen that lacks in PostgreSQL, there are already plans to implement it
> or patches already submitted ?
> If not both could someone give me some hints on how do it and where
> "attach" the code like open the file in postmaster.c intercept the query
> in that function etc.
>
> Thank you in advance :)

we can probably come up with something. can you please give specific
requirements about what type of information you have to keep track of?

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2006-10-12 02:26:48 Re: Storing Procedures / Transactions
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2006-10-12 02:01:47 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ye Qin 2006-10-12 02:44:33 problem with using O_DIRECT
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2006-10-12 02:01:47 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD