| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marco Serantoni" <m(dot)serantoni(at)caltanet(dot)it> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Database Auditing |
| Date: | 2006-10-12 02:11:37 |
| Message-ID: | b42b73150610111911y483421c6maff79d75f091790f@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 10/11/06, Marco Serantoni <m(dot)serantoni(at)caltanet(dot)it> wrote:
> I'm evaluating of use postgresql but for local law requirements is
> needed for the access of some kind of data (sensitive) a log of the
> accesses (Auditing) is a feature available in many databases but i've
> seen that lacks in PostgreSQL, there are already plans to implement it
> or patches already submitted ?
> If not both could someone give me some hints on how do it and where
> "attach" the code like open the file in postmaster.c intercept the query
> in that function etc.
>
> Thank you in advance :)
we can probably come up with something. can you please give specific
requirements about what type of information you have to keep track of?
merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-10-12 02:26:48 | Re: Storing Procedures / Transactions |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-10-12 02:01:47 | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ye Qin | 2006-10-12 02:44:33 | problem with using O_DIRECT |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2006-10-12 02:01:47 | Re: more anti-postgresql FUD |