Re: Win32 max connections bug (causing crashes)

From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "William ZHANG" <uniware(at)zedware(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Win32 max connections bug (causing crashes)
Date: 2006-08-10 16:25:27
Message-ID: b42b73150608100925u67d6b5e7p9083d9769f8d57c8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/10/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "William ZHANG" <uniware(at)zedware(dot)org> writes:
> > Maybe this article can help:
> > Windows and the ClearCase process limit: Understanding the desktop heap
> > http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/05/1220_marechal/
>
> So the short answer is "get a real operating system"?

changing a registry setting is not terrible in and of itself, akin to
manually manipluating procfs, but the behavior is in a failure
condition is. other than that, no comment. personally all my servers
are running mixture of gentoo and centos and i'm moving my desktop to
mac os x.

> I'm not sure I believe that article though, since it claims that the
> default maximum number of noninteractive processes is only 79.
> I thought from what was said upthread that we could get up to a couple
> hundred before seeing a problem.

that would depend on various factors, especially exactly how many
resources the ibm server software ate up for each connection. pg seems
to be leaner and meaner fwiw. anyways, i confirmed the fix.

merlin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-10 16:31:52 Re: libpq Describe Extension [WAS: Bytea and perl]
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2006-08-10 16:14:38 Re: libpq Describe Extension [WAS: Bytea and perl]