From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Janning Vygen" <vygen(at)gmx(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hardware related question: 3ware 9500S |
Date: | 2006-04-12 16:31:50 |
Message-ID: | b42b73150604120931h192f72eel505b32fe0d9c4ff2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 4/12/06, Janning Vygen <vygen(at)gmx(dot)de> wrote:
> Hi,
> disk 1: OS, tablespace
> disk 2: indices, WAL, Logfiles
> - Does my partitioning make sense?
with raid 10 all four drives will appear as a single physical device
shared by all. I'm personally not a big fan of logical partitioning
of a single raid device unless you are trying to keep a physical
volume under 1 TB for example. Each sync on the volume is guaranteed
to sync all 4 disks regardless of how you set your partitions up.
> - I want to know if 3ware 9500 S is recommended or if its one of those
> controllers which sucks.
escalade is a fairly full featured raid controller for the price.
consider it the ford taurus of raid controllers, it's functional and
practical but not sexy. Their S line is not native sata but operates
over a pata->sata bridge. Stay away from raid 5.
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2006-04-12 17:09:17 | Re: sound index |
Previous Message | Ian Harding | 2006-04-12 16:28:28 | Leverage your PostgreSQL V8.1 skills to learn DB2 |