From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | iz(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru |
Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes |
Date: | 2006-03-29 14:08:43 |
Message-ID: | b42b73150603290608s4b10992ta33eb7bddde7e868@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 3/29/06, Ivan Zolotukhin <ivan(dot)zolotukhin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 3/29/06, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > Ivan Zolotukhin wrote:
> > > BTW, are there any plans for its improvement? What are the first
> > > steps for the people who want to contribute to PostgreSQL in this
> > > field?
> >
> > The first step would be making a detailed analysis of what "XML support"
> > is supposed to mean.
>
> So let's make such analysis here within PostgreSQL community! There
> were a lot of talks about XML support in Postgres, but they did not
> lead to any steady work in this direction. IMHO, it's time to start it
> now, no?
IMO, PostgreSQL has the tools to do amazing things in XML. Check out:
1. pl languages (especially pl/perl)
2. funtional indexes
3. xml contrib
4. gist indexes
I agree wtih martijn. If I have XML requirement, I either store it as
black box blob or preprocesss it (possibly with XSLT) into insert
statements. I treat XML no differently than a CSV file for example.
Merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bob Pawley | 2006-03-29 14:08:44 | Connecting |
Previous Message | Tomi NA | 2006-03-29 14:06:42 | Re: PostgreSQL's XML support comparison against other RDBMSes |