From: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 1 TB of memory |
Date: | 2006-03-17 13:55:48 |
Message-ID: | b42b73150603170555l758cef81haa0e9f1d18ee24a0@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 3/16/06, Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:
> PostgreSQL tuned to the max and still too slow? Database too big to
> fit into memory? Here's the solution! http://www.superssd.com/
> products/tera-ramsan/
>
> Anyone purchasing one will be expected to post benchmarks! :)
I like their approach...ddr ram + raid sanity backup + super reliable
power system. Their prices are on jupiter (and i dont mean jupiter,
fl) but hopefully there will be some competition and the invetible
decline in prices. When prices drop from the current 1-2k$/Gb to a
more realistic 250$/Gb there will be no reason not to throw one into a
server. You could already make a case for an entry level one to
handle the WAL and perhaps a few key tables/indexes, particularly ones
that are frequenct vacuum targets.
ddr approach is much faster than flash nvram inherintly and has a
virtually unlimited duty cycle. My prediction is that by 2010 SSD
will be relatively commonplace in the server market, barring some
rediculous goverment intervention (patentes, etc).
merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Evgeny Gridasov | 2006-03-17 14:50:17 | Re: Background writer configuration |
Previous Message | Alex Stapleton | 2006-03-17 13:47:58 | Re: 1 TB of memory |