From: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ron <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What do the Windows pg hackers out there like for dev tools? |
Date: | 2006-02-11 00:40:10 |
Message-ID: | b42b73150602101640p23c93a4i379f61561c38b029@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On 2/10/06, Ron <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net> wrote:
> Subject line says it all. I'm going to be testing changes under both
> Linux and WinXP, so I'm hoping those of you that do M$ hacking will
> pass along your list of suggestions and/or favorite (and hated so I
> know what to avoid) tools.
If you mean hacking postgresql source code, you pretty much have to
use the built in make/build system...this more or less rules out IDEs
and such.
I like UltraEdit for a text editor. Another good choice for editor is
source insight. Winmerge is a fantastic tool and you may want to
check out wincvs/tortoisesvn if you want to do checkouts from the gui.
Of course, to make/build postgresql in windows, you can go with cygwin
or mingw. cygwin is a bit easier to set up and has a more of a unix
flavor but mignw allows you to compile native executables.
The upcoming windows vista will most likely be able to compile
postgresql without an external build system.
Merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2006-02-11 01:57:28 | Re: What do the Windows pg hackers out there like for dev |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-02-11 00:35:34 | Re: Backslashes in string literals |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | uwcssa | 2006-02-11 01:46:14 | postgresql geqo optimization |
Previous Message | Dave Dutcher | 2006-02-10 23:25:20 | Re: joining two tables slow due to sequential scan |