From: | "Claus Guttesen" <kometen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Bill Moran" <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Estimate the size of the SQL file generated by pg_dump utility |
Date: | 2007-03-06 15:09:15 |
Message-ID: | b41c75520703060709j23a17106h184a173f6bcb6b49@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> > I'm curious, what problem does the disclaimer cause?
> >
> > I wrote the following TOS for my personal system:
> > https://www.potentialtech.com/cms/node/9
> > Excerpt of the relevant part:
> > I have no idea if that's legally binding or not, but I've talked to a few
> > associates who have some experience in law, and they all argue that email
> > disclaimers probably aren't legally binding anyway -- so the result is
> > undefined.
>
> No, it's not legally binding. Agreements are only binding if both parties agree, and someone sending you email has not consented to your statement. If I send you something with a copyright mark, you'd better respect it unless you have a signed agreement granting you rights. Federal law always wins.
>
> Disclaimers are bad for two reasons. First, they're powerless. Just because Acme Corp. attaches a disclaimer doesn't mean they've absolved themselves of responsibility for the actions of their employees. Second, they're insulting to the employees. It's a big red flag saying, "We, Acme Corp., hire clowns we don't trust, and THIS person may be one of them!"
Dear sirs, this is off-topic at best. Pls. discontinue this thread.
regards
Claus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Deucher | 2007-03-06 15:25:30 | Re: strange performance regression between 7.4 and 8.1 |
Previous Message | Craig A. James | 2007-03-06 15:07:45 | Re: Estimate the size of the SQL file generated by pg_dump utility |