Re: new commitfest transition guidance

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new commitfest transition guidance
Date: 2025-02-27 12:27:24
Message-ID: b3ed38dd-ee8e-4e6c-8452-42bd19b727ef@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2025-02-27 Th 12:16 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 12:22:52PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> CF 2025-01 has just ended, so I suggest that everyone try this now. We can
>> check in perhaps two weeks whether this results in lots of stuff falling
>> through the cracks or still too much stuff with unclear status being moved
>> forward, and then see what that might mean going forward.
> CF 2025-03 is to begin in more or less 48 hours, and we have still a
> grand total of 72 patches still listed in CF 2025-01:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/51/
>
> It's a good score, as 286 patches have been moved without doing any
> kind of massive bulky and manual vacuum work on all these entries.
>
> As these have not been moved by their respective authors and/or
> reviewers, perhaps, based on the guidance I am reading from this
> thread, it would be time to give up on these rather than move them
> around?

There are 4 marked "Ready For Committer" - all authored by committers :-)

Maybe the message isn't getting through, After I got the email message,
I moved one yesterday that I am listed on as an author although I'm not
really, but the real author had not moved.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2025-02-27 12:43:50 Re: SQLFunctionCache and generic plans
Previous Message Alexander Pyhalov 2025-02-27 12:25:03 Re: SQLFunctionCache and generic plans