Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE
Date: 2021-08-07 20:49:18
Message-ID: b3e96083-84d3-4b11-894b-7fc4e2e937e4@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 8/7/21 3:43 PM, Michael Meskes wrote:
>
>> No other committer (certainly nobody on the RMT) knows anything about
>> ecpg. How much longer were you expecting us to wait for a simple
>> status update?
> Where did I say I expect you to wait? How could I even do that given
> that I didn't even know you were waiting for a status update from me?
>

Michael,

During the Beta period, every open item is the responsibility of the
relevant committer. There is an expectation that each item will be dealt
with in a timely fashion. It is the RMT's responsibility to monitor the
open items list and take action if any item on the list endangers the
timing or stability of the release.

In the present instance all we have had from you is a terse statement
that you were under pressure of work, with the implication that you
would deal with the item in an unspecified way at an unspecified time in
the future. We don't think that meets the requirements I stated above.

W.r.t. previous contact regarding this item, I sent you email on July
23rd. It was addressed to  <mailto:meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> and had this text:

> Michael,
>
>
> This is an open item for release 14. Please let us know if you are going
> to attend to it.
>

Other committers with items on the list can probably testify to the fact
that we have dropped them similar notes via email or messenger app, so
you're certainly not being singled out.

Peter followed up to your eventual note on the list on the 30th. So
we've taken substantial steps to make you aware of what is expected.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2021-08-07 20:53:47 Re: Commitfest overflow
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2021-08-07 20:36:41 Re: Refactor ECPGconnect and allow IPv6 connection