Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, buildfarm(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?
Date: 2024-05-13 14:19:04
Message-ID: b3904089-029a-4f59-9247-b3aa20b91b44@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2024-05-12 Su 18:05, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 12:26 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> Well, this is more or less where I came in back in about 2002 :-) I've been trying to help support it ever since, mainly motivated by stubborn persistence than anything else. Still, I agree that the lack of support for the Windows port from Microsoft over the years has been more than disappointing.
> I think "state of the Windows port" would make a good discussion topic
> at pgconf.dev (with write-up for those who can't be there). If there
> is interest, I could organise that with a short presentation of the
> issues I am aware of so far and possible improvements and
> smaller-things-we-could-drop-instead-of-dropping-the-whole-port. I
> would focus on technical stuff, not who-should-be-doing-what, 'cause I
> can't make anyone do anything.
>

+1

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-05-13 14:19:36 Re: Direct SSL connection with ALPN and HBA rules
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-05-13 14:13:20 Re: WAL_LOG CREATE DATABASE strategy broken for non-standard page layouts