From: | torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Allow pg_archivecleanup to remove backup history files |
Date: | 2023-06-20 13:27:36 |
Message-ID: | b367dba446c2859358b15a5e18e4f165@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-06-19 14:37, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 11:24:29AM +0900, torikoshia wrote:
>> Thanks, now I understand what you meant.
>
> If I may ask, why is the refactoring of 0003 done after the feature in
> 0002? Shouldn't the order be reversed? That would make for a cleaner
> git history.
> --
> Michael
Agreed.
Reversed the order of patches 0002 and 0003.
--
Regards,
--
Atsushi Torikoshi
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v9-0001-Introduce-pg_archivecleanup-into-getopt_long.patch | text/x-diff | 4.0 KB |
v9-0002-Refactored-to-reduce-the-nesting-level.patch | text/x-diff | 5.3 KB |
v9-0003-Allow-pg_archivecleanup-to-remove-backup-history-.patch | text/x-diff | 10.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joel Jacobson | 2023-06-20 14:56:12 | Re: Do we want a hashset type? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2023-06-20 13:21:14 | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |