Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table

From: Andrej <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: A B <gentosaker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENEAL] dynamically changing table
Date: 2009-03-30 19:03:06
Message-ID: b35603930903301203l7b9cab9s61d79709b389c294@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2009/3/31 A B <gentosaker(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> One option is, put it in a db as a huge text (or in textfiles, one
> per object) and parse it when you need it. That might also work.
>
> Why are you demanding sanity? I need crazy ideas to get this to work ;-)
Heh ... sorry, but "dynamic table" just SCREAMS "design flaw!!" ... as pointed
out above, an approach with the "new columns" being rows in a separate
table sounds quite sane.

Cheers,
Andrej

--
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes concise.

http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/htmlmail.htm

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-03-30 19:03:35 Re: PostgreSql with or without Plus?
Previous Message Steve Crawford 2009-03-30 18:55:53 string_to_array with empty input