Re: Hijack!

From: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
Cc: "Leif B(dot) Kristensen" <leif(at)solumslekt(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hijack!
Date: 2007-12-14 18:45:08
Message-ID: b35603930712141045x3702e3ccn62f3eea64e1ba0e2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 12/15/07, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> wrote:
L > Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
O > I > me too.
L > t >
> ' > On Wednesday 12. December 2007, Gregory Stark wrote:
> s >> "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> >>> Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> n >>>> Joshua D. Drake, 11.12.2007 17:43:
> o >>>>> O.k. this might be a bit snooty but frankly it is almost 2008. If
> t >>>>> you are still a top poster, you obviously don't care about the
> >>>>> people's content that you are replying to, to have enough wits
> to
> t >>>>> not top post.
> h >>>> I personally find non-trimmed bottom postings at lot more
> annoying
> e >>>> than top-postings. But then that's probably just me.
> >>> It's not just you. Much as I am annoyed by top-posting, I am much
> w >>> more so by people who top-post at the bottom. Hey, did I say
> o >>> something stupid? No -- think about it. These guys do exactly the
> r >>> same thing as top-posters, except it is much worse because the
> s >>> actual text they wrote is harder to find.
> t >>>
> >>> --

In response to

  • Re: Hijack! at 2007-12-14 17:08:38 from Richard Huxton

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Chernow 2007-12-14 19:44:00 Julian Day 0 question
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-12-14 18:12:10 Re: size cost for null fields