From: | "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Craig Hawkes" <craig(dot)hawkes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Using Postgres as a "embedded" / SQL Lite database on Windows |
Date: | 2007-10-25 00:49:26 |
Message-ID: | b35603930710241749g30dd3f05xa242e3f8aa82fc9@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 10/25/07, Craig Hawkes <craig(dot)hawkes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> There will really be two targets, replacing the existing single user
> solutions, and providing a larger solution with multi-user etc. There is
> however large base of similar code between these solutions, and it would be
> perferable if they could use the same back-end engine or something very
> simliar. I know some people will aruge that you should use the right tool
> for the job, and I guess I am tring to see if there is a right tool which
> will work for both these.
I guess you could be looking at an intermediate abstraction layer
that will allow your application to communicate with whatever database
that newly added tier can talk to.
> My main/only real hesiation with Postgres is around supporting non IT users,
> mainly around installation. I am keen to here peoples comments on this, and
> what steps could be taken to mitigate these.
The "immediate" option that springs to mind would be to offer
consultancy and installation support.
> Thank you for your comments
> Craig
Cheers,
Andrej
P.S.: Please, do not top post :} ... see my sig for reasons.
--
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes concise.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Travers | 2007-10-25 01:10:59 | Migration questions for upcoming 8.3 release and fts |
Previous Message | Guy Rouillier | 2007-10-25 00:15:33 | Re: Install plJava |