| From: | "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tino Wildenhain" <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
| Cc: | "Postgres General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Debian problem... |
| Date: | 2007-09-12 17:59:31 |
| Message-ID: | b35603930709121059o31077836i5670173308ce05d4@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 9/12/07, Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> wrote:
> Alternatively you could use XFS but I'm not sure if it performs
> better on failing hardware. I guess not.
Actually I've seen anecdotal evidence that XFS with its
aggressive write-caching has caused data-loss in the
event of power-failures.
I'm not certain how sensible Reiser, which is optimised
for efficiency with small files, would be for a postgres
data directory in terms of performance. ext3 or jfs
maybe?
> Regards
> Tino
Cheers,
Andrej
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-09-12 18:19:17 | Re: Event-driven programming? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-12 17:42:31 | Re: problems with large table |