From: | "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Linux distro |
Date: | 2007-08-02 18:44:15 |
Message-ID: | b35603930708021144w78544ac4vef1e467b8cbaf918@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8/3/07, Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> wrote:
> > I'm curious: which aspect of hardware administration
> > on a Linux box would require X (to be running)? If I *really*
> It's not that it can't be done, it's that having a window environment can
> make things easier. (I find 24x80 pretty cramped, and I like large
> scrollback buffers.)
So I make my xterm on my workstation be 134x80, with a
line buffer of 8000 and then ssh into the server :}
> But like most computer efficiency questions, this whole thread tangent
> boils down to how much overhead you want your computer to dedicate to
> making your life easier at the expense of whatever else it was supposed to
> be doing.
True that. Same for how many potential vulnerabilities
I'm willing to introduce for the sake of convenience. Not
that I'd find it convenient to drive the 40Km to the data-
centre to get physical access to the servers, mind you.
Cheers,
Andrej
--
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes concise.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dawid Kuroczko | 2007-08-02 18:57:30 | Re: What do people like to monitor (or in other words, what might be nice in pgsnmpd)? |
Previous Message | Ben | 2007-08-02 18:37:59 | Re: Linux distro |