From: | "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Linux distro |
Date: | 2007-08-01 18:11:33 |
Message-ID: | b35603930708011111j1a7a45fek81e518c9a3a4b0ec@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8/2/07, Reid Thompson <Reid(dot)Thompson(at)ateb(dot)com> wrote:
> If it's a dedicated production server, look at UBUNTU 6.10 server.
> If you're planning to connect a monitor and run X-windows ( i.e. I
> bought a server, but i'm going to use it as a learning platform for
> LINUX in general also), i'd suggest either UBUNTU 6.10 or 7.04 desktop
> ( or, start with the 6.10 server, and use apt/synaptic/etc to add
> whatever additional packages you want )
No offense, but *if* you have to suggest Ubuntu you should be
suggesting 6.06 LTS, not any of the bleating, errrh, bleeding edge
and quickly fluctuating versions. In a production server environment
people commonly aren't eager to update the whole OS every year. I
certainly wouldn't.
And if you settle for a stable server environment, I, too, would
rather go with the original debian than with ubuntu. Not that
I particularly like either of them :}
Cheers,
Andrej
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrej Ricnik-Bay | 2007-08-01 18:30:22 | Re: Linux distro |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2007-08-01 17:48:53 | Re: Linux distro |