Re: The name of the game (was Re: postgre linkage with non-postgre db)

From: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The name of the game (was Re: postgre linkage with non-postgre db)
Date: 2006-07-13 08:26:42
Message-ID: b35603930607130126i7bad7bfbm6548db586a21760e@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-novice

On 7/13/06, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> wrote:

> > I heard people making this same mistake in presentations at this
> > past weekend's Postgres Anniversary Conference
> Too bad :-(
Probably stems from the common misconception that
SQL should be pronounced as See-quell, hence
postgreh-See-Quell, or postgreh if you don't feel like
saying see-quell...

:}

Cheers,
Andrej

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-07-13 10:50:10 Re: 10 Years And Counting
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2006-07-13 06:58:48 Re: The name of the game (was Re: postgre linkage with non-postgre

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg 2006-07-13 09:55:52 Re: increment counter in VIEW
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2006-07-13 06:58:48 Re: The name of the game (was Re: postgre linkage with non-postgre