Re: May be BUG. Periodic burst growth of the checkpoint_req counter on replica.

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <a(dot)melnikov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Anton A(dot) Melnikov" <aamelnikov(at)inbox(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: May be BUG. Periodic burst growth of the checkpoint_req counter on replica.
Date: 2024-09-18 17:21:40
Message-ID: b2a9c3e1-1dfe-4bf4-b3cd-73798bcc0312@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024/09/18 21:22, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>> Patch attached.
>> Unless there are any objections, I plan to commit this and back-patch it to v17.
>
> I've checked this patch, it looks good to me.
>
> Generally, it looks like I should be in charge for this, given I've
> committed previous patch by Anton. Thank you for reacting here faster
> than me. Please, go ahead with the patch.

Thanks for the review! Pushed!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2024-09-18 18:04:28 Re: May be BUG. Periodic burst growth of the checkpoint_req counter on replica.
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2024-09-18 15:58:34 Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness