Re: Finally upgrading to 9.6!

On 10/18/2017 6:24 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 10/17/2017 11:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> writes:
>>> Where can I look to see (roughly) how much more RAM/CPU/disk needed
>>> when
>>> moving from 8.4 and 9.2?
>> It's entirely possible you'll need *less*, as you'll be absorbing the
>> benefit of several years' worth of performance improvements. But this
>> is such a workload-dependent thing that there's no general answer.
>
> XML stored in blobs (not sure whether text or bytea) and b-tree indexes.
>

A bit off-topic here, but why upgrade to 9.6 when you can upgrade to 10.0?

Obviously you're not one to upgrade often so shouldn't you take
advantage of all of the new features and improvements when "finally" (to
use your own word) upgrading?

Igal Sapir
Lucee Core Developer
Lucee.org <http://lucee.org/>