Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steven Pousty <steve(dot)pousty(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date: 2020-04-30 04:12:48
Message-ID: b1f89d14-cd7f-e43d-964e-9fb04e209b72@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/29/20 11:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> Clearly I was caught doing a single browser test (Chrome).
>
> Well, I've not tested anything but Safari, either ...
>
>> Reverted back to the verbose way sans !important, attached, which
>> appears to be the consensus. If you can ACK this, I'll commit.
>
> This one works for me.

Pushed. Thanks!

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-04-30 04:22:05 Re: shared-memory based stats collector
Previous Message Andy Fan 2020-04-30 04:01:38 Can we remove the other_rels_list parameter for make_rels_by_clause_joins