From: | marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: per table random-page-cost? |
Date: | 2009-10-20 08:31:42 |
Message-ID: | b1b9fac60910200131j2e9901b5n8f11adab40f199b0@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> If the parameter is defined as "the chance that a page is in cache"
>> there is very real physical meaning to it.
>
> We have no such parameter...
What a simple person like me would think would work is:
- call the parameter "cached_probability".
- Invent a way to store it (I`d actually try to do it the exact same
way recent "alter table set statistics distinct" does it)
a) less radical idea: replace all usage of random_page_cost with
seq_page_cost * cached_probability + random_page_cost *
(1-cached_probability)
b) more radical idea:
b1) invent a new GUC: cached_page_cost
b2) replace all usage of seq_page_cost with cached_page_cost *
cached_probability + seq_page_cost * (1-cached_probability)
b3) replace all usage of random_page_cost with cached_page_cost *
cached_probability + random_page_cost * (1-cached_probability)
> How would you come up with sensible figures for this hypothetical parameter?
select schemaname,relname,heap_blks_hit /
cast(heap_blks_read+heap_blks_hit+1 as float)
from pg_statio_all_tables
Would be a nice starting point.
Greetings
Marcin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-10-20 08:43:01 | Re: Hot standby, pausing recovery |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-10-20 07:53:03 | Re: Application name patch - v2 |