Re: LIMIT confuses the planner

From: marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: kouber(at)saparev(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LIMIT confuses the planner
Date: 2009-03-23 00:12:14
Message-ID: b1b9fac60903221712n255525a6w8575ccb4a75d56bb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> So the bottom line here is just that the estimated n_distinct is too
> low.  We've seen before that the equation we use tends to do that more
> often than not.  I doubt that consistently erring on the high side would
> be better though :-(.  Estimating n_distinct from a limited sample of
> the population is known to be a statistically hard problem, so we'll
> probably not ever have perfect answers, but doing better is on the
> to-do list.
>

I hit an interestinhg paper on n_distinct calculation:

http://www.pittsburgh.intel-research.net/people/gibbons/papers/distinct-values-chapter.pdf

the PCSA algorithm described there requires O(1) calculation per
value. Page 22 describes what to do with updates streams.

This I think (disclaimer: I know little about PG internals) means that
the n_distinct estimation can be done during vacuum time (it would
play well with the visibility map addon).

What do You think?

Greetings
Marcin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message marcin mank 2009-03-23 00:56:50 Re: LIMIT confuses the planner
Previous Message Laurent Wandrebeck 2009-03-22 23:14:52 Re: "iowait" bug?