Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items

From: "marcin mank" <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
Date: 2008-12-26 00:42:29
Message-ID: b1b9fac60812251642g2b2c9940h9997e0e53ad3fa16@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Perhaps we should listen to the people that have said they don't want
> queries cancelled, even if the alternative is inconsistent answers.

I think an alternative to that would be "if the wal backlog is too
big, let current queries finish and let incoming queries wait till the
backlog gets smaller".

fell free to ignore me, as a non-hacker I`m not even supposed to be
reading this list :-]

Greetings
Marcin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2008-12-26 00:46:20 Re: [idea] a copied relkind in pg_attribute
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2008-12-25 18:43:56 Re: [idea] a copied relkind in pg_attribute